Would you like to join me in banishing the phrase “it might be a stupid question, but….”? Here are a few alternatives:
“Here is a question…”
“Here is a question to get our thinking going…”
“Here is another question…”
“An obvious question might be…”
“It may be a question somebody's asked before…”
I like obvious questions. They can be helpful in getting the flow of more questions going. They can also give us a bit of licence to start exploring things from a position of safety or relative familiarity. Warming up, if you like, before coalescing around the things we need to explore.
I’ve sat in countless leadership team, management and board meetings where an “obvious” question really was the first step towards useful thinking that brought in new ideas and wider perspectives. If we are working in a space where people feel the need to ask forgiveness or apologise for asking a question, what does that tell us?
Someone recently introduced me to The Right Questions Institute (https://rightquestion.org/). I really love the idea of an Institute dedicated to improving the way we ask questions - and particularly one that emphasises that by asking better questions we can learn to give better answers too.
In cricket a bowler is said to be “asking questions” of a batter when they are bowling consistently in the “corridor of uncertainty,” drawing the batter into playing a shot to every ball and eventually missing or edging a catch. How can we ask questions that are consistent like that? And similarly, when we are working out big things ourselves, what would it be like to consistently be asked questions in the “corridor of uncertainty”?
Hopefully we'd achieve greater clarity on the way to laser focus. Simple questions work best too. Writer and virtuoso coach Claire Pedrick has written about how to have transformational conversations by doing less.
"What shall we ask questions about today?"
"What is our question today?"
"How will we know when we have asked the right question?"
I was asked a question like that recently. I hope you get to be asked a question like that soon too!
Juggling involves a complex interplay of energy transformations and transfers.
As the juggler throws a ball upward, they impart kinetic energy to it. As the ball rises, kinetic energy is converted into potential energy. At the peak of its trajectory, the ball's kinetic energy is momentarily zero, and its potential energy is at its maximum. I can’t juggle but I get a little buzz just thinking about that!
As the ball falls back down, the potential energy is converted back into kinetic energy. This cycle continues throughout the juggling.
The juggler continually adds energy into the system by applying force to throw the balls upward. This energy compensates for energy lost due to air resistance and imperfect elastic collisions with the hands. Did you, like me, have no idea your hands were capable of “imperfect elastic collision”?
When you are “juggling” a lot of big things be they balls, strategic plans, proposals, multi-dimensional work/life-chessboard-moves, how can you identify the point of maximum potential energy?
And once you have, what would you do with that?
What are you juggling that could, potentially, benefit from some more energy?
What’s your buoyancy aid to thinking and problem solving?
Have you noticed that sometimes to get unstuck all you need to do is walk away (maybe even go for a walk) and come back with a clearer head or a different perspective?
I love to do a Spelling Bee (an app based word game where you are given 7 letters, one of which must be included in every word you spell. You score 1 point for four letter words, 5 for five and 14 for a "panagram": a word containing all seven letters).
I enjoy it because I like words (logophile - a 14 pointer!) and I like doing things where you get feedback like “Great!... Amazing!... Genius!” Who doesn't? However, I’m often stuck and sometimes don’t “see” the panagram.
On Sunday I got stuck. I then went for a walk. I had another look when I got back and “BANG!”. There it was, right in front of my eyes: “Buoyant”. 14 points. Thank you very much.
For me, stepping away or going for a walk as a thinking and problem solving tool works everywhere, from frivolous word games to "deep work". It is one of the most powerful thinking tools in my box. What's yours?
Last month I both delivered and received some training. I like to think that I’ve been looking after my own CPD whilst supporting other people in theirs too. One thing that came up for me is the idea that:
This seems to be attributed to the British statistician George Box - which feels right because for me it has a definite sense of thinking outside the box. Models are helpful in supporting learning and development by providing a structure so we know where we are going and how we might get there. Teachers often talk about scaffolding, which I like, because you can take it away when it is no longer needed.
In the same week that I was reminded of that saying about models, I was introduced to the idea of Polarity Management (Yes, I know - model alert!) which was first introduced in the 1970s by Barry Johnson. What I particularly like about this model is that in its simplest sense it can be distilled down to a both/and approach as a liberating alternative in a world too often constrained by either/or thinking. The idea being that we often fixate on choosing one option over another when we might actually get to where we need to be by combining the best of both “poles” - and learn something along the way. For me, that is useful.
Breathing is given as the exemplar both/and: doing too much of either pole - inhaling or exhaling - leads to the worst case scenario, death. The right balance continuously exchanges oxygen for carbon dioxide, life.
This is the bit where I challenge you to think of a practical example of a both/and. Here are five I've been looking at recently:
Consolidated versus distributed
Top down versus bottom up
Global versus individual
Open versus closed
Shish versus Donner
I made the last one up as I haven’t had lunch yet but hopefully by now you might be able to start spotting opportunities for you own both/and thinking? (Whilst holding in mind that sometimes we still need to make some either/or decision too...) Here is a link to short TED talk introducing Polarity Management.
I’m doing some strategy work at the moment. Some reading I did over the Christmas break has been helpful to move thinking on with this.
Three Horizons: The Patterning of Hope, by Bill Sharpe introduces an approach to thinking about the future that combines Horizon 1 (building on the way we currently do things); Horizon 3 (a visionary way of think about the future, unfettered by Horizon 1 assumptions) and Horizon 2, which is described as “ambiguous innovation” - the bridge between the two.
The value of this approach is that it brings all three horizons into play and helps challenge assumptions (from our Horizon 1 way of thinking) that may inhibit our Horizon 3 thinking. I think this is sometimes called the “deep thinking” bit.
Yesterday I had coffee with a friend who has a technology leadership role in a US firm. I often try out a new idea like this, rehearsing and seeing how it feels and sounds with a kind audience. He instantly recognised this approach from his own work and had some useful perspectives to add.
Picking up on this the next day in preparation for a call this afternoon I was thinking again about Horizon 2 and the image of the Roman god Janus appeared in my mind's eye (a reasonable grasp of the Greek and Roman Pantheons is one of the benefits of a degree in Ancient History and Archaeology). A couple of thoughts slotted into place in one of those “aha” moments.
And as you will know from reading a previous post: An “aha”, or insight is only as good as applying it with awareness. So, here is the “aha” insight I had and a three point plan for what I’m going to do with it:
The Roman God Janus (or Ianus) was associated with beginnings, gates, transitions, time, duality, doorways. Sometimes known as Ianus Bifrons ("Two-faced Janus") He is often depicted with two faces - and as a result looked both ways. He didn’t have a temple as such, but a gate. Janus is the titular deity for January (as Juno is for June). My “aha” came when I was thinking about the idea of facing both ways at once. In that moment, for me, the whole idea of the Three Horizons, outlined above, made sense.
So what. Well, the “what am I going to do differently as a result of this new thought?” is this:
I have written it down here. A simple step you might think but a useful one for me at any rate in clarifying my thoughts on this!
I have created a simple framework - a set of questions - that I can apply in the work I mentioned above, starting today.
I am going to bring my own Janus-faced two way thinking into both pieces of work and ask for specific feedback from my clients about that.
Before I finished work for Christmas a certain professional networking site proposed that my experience in fundraising and management in the charity and social enterprise sector might mean I have something to contribute to an article on the question “What are some effective ways to manage stress in fundraising?”
I deleted the email notification. Switched off my laptop and had a restful break. However, I thought about it again when I started work in the new year.
Anybody who has used AI to come up with answers to questions will spot that the headings (see old version, below) are pretty generic to any area of work and not just fundraising. For some reason that got my back up (it just felt like not much thought had gone into it?).
As did the tone - “No wonder you are feeling stressed - it must be because you haven’t got the awareness to “identify your triggers” and you aren’t “practising self-care.” You could say just thinking about that got me slightly stressed!
So, I decided to rewrite this five point plan - partly inspired by working with a couple of recent clients who reminded me about the energy we can harness with a really exciting goal or two. So here’s my version (note the re-ordering).
In relation to my point number 3, here is what actress Tallulah Bankhead said that I love: “If I had to live my life again, I’d make the same mistakes, only sooner.”
I managed to put that article to one side and ignore it over Christmas because I was having a break myself. and do you know what the first thing I did when I got back to work was this year? I eased myself in with a half a day combining some work with turning three kilos of Seville oranges into delicious marmalade. Because what sets me up for the day without fail is fresh coffee, toast and a bit of marmalade. For me, having a cupboard filled with home-made marmalade is what self-care in January looks like. And like the best good habits it just keeps giving all year long!
A quick review of some of my most rewarding work last year. Five out of six projects started out as “we have a fundraising challenge”. Early on in each of these assignments the real focus became clearer (in no particular order) communication, succession, impact, growing (impact and scale) within a complex system.
One in particular resonated with me which started as “We need to develop a fundraising strategy.” For some reason reflecting on that had me replaying one of my favourite scenes in Star Wars (yes, I know, but stick with me).
The entranced guard repeats his words: “These aren’t the droids we are looking for,” and waves them through.
This exchange played out in my head over Christmas as I remembered the words of my client: “It isn’t a fundraising strategy we are looking for!” (In my imagination I do a very passable Alec Guiness.)
So, what is my point? Well there are two.
Firstly, very often the thing that is most on people’s minds when they perceive a fundraising challenge is a fundraising challenge. The background and wider context are just as important, if not more so. This is true of very many challenges we face if you think about it.
This was certainly the case with my client. Their thinking changed when they saw that the work they had already done got them most of the way there and the final steps were around communication, engagement and influence. That opened the door for a much more valuable exploration of what was most important - oh, and six months on fundraising targets have been exceeded.
Which links to the second point, which is about the difference between insight and awareness. The former is often about seeing or realising something for the first time. The latter is a process of development involving applied learning and change. I am pretty good a the former. In 2024 I want to pay more attention to the latter.
What could your inner force help redirect your attention to this year?
I’ve been thinking, talking (and writing) about values recently. And once again my best insight comes from what other people have said to me. Here, then are a few thoughts about values and a values exercise can do in the comfort of your own home, your office or journey to or from one to the other if that is your thing.
I mentioned in a previous piece how reflecting on the values we hold is not only useful but - in my opinion - essential. (You can read that here, https://thinkpositivechange.scjh.uk/home#h.h7zrkuteugvu).
I ask my clients for feedback throughout our work together and after each assignment ends. What I have noticed more recently – and particularly since setting out my intentions for how I want to bring my values into the work I do – is that they see my values as important too. This feels significant.
Why and so what? Here are a few phrases that I’ve pulled out from some recent coaching client feedback.
It was fun... Simon pushed me out of my comfort zone
Managed the time really effectively which made me think more deeply
New sense of confidence around my role as a leader
Strongly supportive listening environment
A leap forward both in practical terms and also in my confidence
The right balance between supporting and challenging
Simon’s supportive, kind and optimistic approach has given me more clarity and confidence.
This all feels important because these sentiments echo the things against which I hold myself to account.
So, how does this help you? I’d better get on to that before I hear you cry “This just sounds like Simon bragging about his values and his nice feedback. Smug git.”
Well, the point I want to make is this. If the things I want to “bring” to my work and the changes I make to how I turn up start appearing in client feedback, then hopefully, I’m on the right track. Self-reflection to identify my areas for development so I can add more value to the people I work with.
I think work should be fun as well as challenging so that sounds good to me. As does creating a space to think deeply and build a sense of clarity and confidence and make progress. I certainly know that I've been at my best when those are true for me.
I was recently at an event to launch the 15th Impact Report of the SkillsBuilder Partnership (where I spent six years of my working life – and where I probably learned more than in the previous 15!). The expert panel (always have an expert panel for an impact report launch – it adds different perspectives and humour) agreed on several things, one of which was that the skills that make us human (including listening, presenting ideas, problem-solving, creativity, aiming high, staying positive, teamwork and leadership) are the ones that distinguish us from robots (they put it more eloquently that I can). In other words, our future and our future employment depend on it.
If you are clear on your values and can work out how to bring them to life (through the skills mentioned above) you will notice the difference. So, what are your values and how do you like them to show up?
And if you are feeling curious I've included a simple exercise, below, designed to identify your values and then reflect on them. You will need a sheet of paper, a pen and no more than 20 minutes. Try it on your own or with your team. And let me know how you get on!
How many organisations have a set of values that are intended to guide everything they do but which on closer scrutiny, well, don’t?
My experience is that most people talk about “Mission, Vision, Values” in that order, or sometimes, “Vision, Mission, Values.” Have you ever heard “Vision, Values, Mission”? See my Venn Diagram for how I think these fit together.
A few years ago I was a member of the leadership team of an organisation that wasn’t sure if the founding values still fitted. So, we spent a morning having a look at them; reflecting on what was true; what was less so now; and what might be a useful way to refresh the values and “keep them real”.
Two simple steps forward were, one, asking “how do we do this?” for each value and two, including a focus on values in formal and informal feedback.
Bringing something that had been in the background further forward really paid off.
Spending some time away from “the task” (getting the job done) and looking at “process” (the how we are and how we do things) is always useful, particularly in teams that don’t come together as regularly as they might. Values are really useful when we think about “how we show up together.”
But what about the personal values we all hold? When did you last check in on those? Often, the very act of bringing our own personal values to the surface can be surprising and revealing in unexpected ways.
Similarly, reflecting on how we bring these to the table (be it boardroom, team meeting, breakfast, supper, ping-pong, flat-packed-assembly etc) can open up new insights and possibilities.
Assuming you are clear on your personal vision (Are you? And if so, how clear?), What are the values that guide you in everything you do? If you haven’t thought about what these are recently there are plenty of freely available tools to help with that. “A nice way of getting to know yourself better,” as someone said to me recently.
The value in all of this – I think, and as coaching clients tell me – is getting stuck in and engaging with what we hold as our guiding principles. As my Venn diagram suggests, there is a careful balance to be struck between our values, our vision and our mission. And that is as true for the organisations and teams we work in and with as it is for every individual.
Here are a couple of examples of what I mean by getting “stuck in” – one is a set of questions you might ask yourself or of others; the other is a simple exercise that works as well on your own, one-to-one or in a group:
Questions:
Thinking of a time when you felt your values were not recognised, what were you seeking to achieve? What was being said? What wasn’t said or acknowledged? What would you do differently next time?
Exercise:
Step 1: Draw the Venn diagram (see above, three overlapping circles labelled Vision, Values, Mission).
Step 2: Write “Future” and circle it for where you want to be on that diagram. What is the balance you want between the three?
Step 3: Write “Now” and circle it for where you are now.
Step 4: What do you need to do more of, less of or differently to get from “Now” to “Future”?
And if you get stuck with any of this or would like any support with any of this please get in touch!”
[Warning - this 400 word piece ends with a reference to late-1980s soft rock]
"Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply." Stephen Covey
For the majority of my working life I was definitely one of most people. Hopefully there is still time to put that right!
During 20 years as a fundraiser too often I made the mistake of listening to a potential donor, and to colleagues only in order to let them finish before it was “my turn.” I definitely learned the hard way (and continue to learn) that listening, really listening, and giving someone “a really good listening to” (whoever I first heard this phrase from please let me know so I can thank you properly!) is a whole new level.
According to SkillsBuilder (the universal framework for essential skills: https://www.skillsbuilder.org/universal-framework/listening) listening is the “receiving, retaining and processing of information and ideas.” It is a teachable and learnable skill and can be broken down into steps from “getting started” (think carpet-time in primary school) to “mastery” (listening beyond simply the words being said and being able to objectively evaluate different perspectives).
If I were to ask you “How do you know someone is really listening to you?” You might say, “They are making eye contact, they don’t interrupt, and they might ask me a question or make a comment based on what I said, which might include some of the words I used.” These are all common examples given of what listening “looks like”.
If I were to ask you “How do you know you are really listening to someone else?” Would you say you do the same things? Or something else?
When you are listening at your best, what are you doing? What are you thinking, and yes - because these matter too! - what are you feeling?
When I finally felt I was improving as a listener I became a better fundraiser and colleague. Simply put, I spent more time seeking to understand the world (the needs, wants and priorities) of the people and organsations we worked with. Today, in my work as a coach and consultant I hope my clients feel they are getting “a good listening to” as we agree what we want to achieve together and as we work towards that.
Listening is a collaboration between our whole bodies (how we sit, our gestures, for example): starting with our ears, and including our minds and our hearts. As Swedish soft-rockers Roxette put it back in 1988: “listen to your heart”. Feelings matter and exploring them is an essential part of listening.
"The most important thing in communication is hearing what isn't said."
Peter Drucker
As a fundraiser one of the biggest mistakes I made was to think that what I said was the most important part of any conversation. It took me a while to understand this was wrong and see how it put too much pressure on me every time I thought it was my turn to open my mouth.
How are we supposed to hear what isn’t said? In music, silence is possibly the most powerful means of creating an emotional transformation on the part of the listener. Try Mahler’s 9th Symphony, John Cage’s 4’33’’ or Ella Fitzgerald singing I Can’t Stop Loving You.
Another musical term is “tacet” which is Latin for “it is silent” used when an instrument or section sits out a movement or even an entire piece. A tacit understanding is of course, something understood without being said.
How does a musical analogy get us any closer to understanding how to listen for meaning in silences? Well, when we listen to music we somehow know how to do it; whereas in everyday conversation we seem to have either unlearned that skill or not developed it as well as we might. Similarly we seem to have a sense of what it means to “read between the lines” and find the “hidden meaning” of a passage of poetry or prose. So why are we so bad at listening to the spaces between words? Which is, I think, the wrong - or at least a not very helpful - question.
A better question might be: How can we listen better to what is really being said? Albert Mehrabian is well known for the model that suggests communication is 7% the words we use, 38% the tone of voice and 55% the body language and facial expression.
I think therein lies the answer. We need to spend more attention on the other 93%. Here is perhaps my all time favourite - a technique learned from those far wiser than me but one that has helped me improve my own listening in every area of my life. Here it is:
“When you say [insert what they just said here], what do you mean by that?”
In our everyday conversations, hearing back what was just said can help us - both the speaker and the listener - get closer to the meaning. Sometimes it is the luxury of having the space to say it again differently and hear a different perspective.
And going back to my early fundraising career, building rapport and trust - the foundations of any good, long-term relationships - became far more natural when I shifted to a mode of listening and curiosity about someone else’s world.
What are you doing when you are listening most effectively?
I’ve just used possibly the oldest technique to get past a creative block by going for a walk.
Other things that work for me include:
Regular breaks
Sitting in different locations
Going back to something later to come at it “from a different angle”
Asking for help
Asking myself how would the person I’d like to ask for help think about this
I’ve also copied other people's great ideas. This week I’ve updated my calendar invite/link in my email footer to a 25 minute slot. The result of this simple change is that I have had five meeting requests in two days.
Please do share your favourite techniques. I’m genuinely interested in what they are and how you applied them too (the magic bit).
The big prize in all of this is how to do these things consistently for the things we really want to change. I was very chuffed to get a piece of feedback from a recent client who said: “You really helped get us out of the "stuckness"!”
The reflection here was that my role in the shift was about asking the right questions consistently (and persistently) - a balance of support and challenge - bringing out other perspectives - and helping to create a space for new and different thinking.
Please do share your ideas for getting past “stuck”. I’d love to hear them.
And if you’d like to evaluate your creativity and think about next steps towards mastery, there’s always https://www.skillsbuilder.org/universal-framework/creativity!
I joined an excellent session earlier this summer on using AI tools in fundraising, led by the brilliant Emily Casson from the Salvation Army. Having been playing around with tools like Chat GPT and Anthropic a bit in my own work, the timing was perfect. The session got me thinking about how tools like these can support our creative processes, but also the fundamental principles of asking better questions - whether that be of robots, colleagues, family or friends.
After a short exchange with Anthropic’s Claude tool (as part of a piece of work for a client seeking to review and develop their approach to growing a fundraising pipeline) I was struck by a couple of things. Firstly, I mostly got a fairly predictable set of answers. Secondly, I was conscious of the parallels with asking questions more generally. For example, the real value is in thinking about the question first. Why?
Asking better questions generally results in better answers - think about the game called “hotter or colder” and the moment the seeker is nearly there because the answers literally take them to the desired destination step-by-step.
A question asked that builds on what has just been said is more likely to get closer to a useful answer - particularly so when asking questions of humans as it shows that you were listening, which builds trust.
Questions that help the people we work with find out useful stuff for themselves help them do better work which is more interesting, rewarding and fun.
The human brain is 90% water. No AI tools can compete with that in terms of fluidity - for that I mean lateral thinking, playfulness, curiously wandering around more than one idea to get a better perspective, and so on. Asking questions creatively can just be messing around while we get our bearings before getting back on track to where we want to go next.
So, if you are using AI tools to complement your own creative process, think clearly about the question first. And don't forget that putting the same thought into asking questions of colleagues, friends and family is not only respectful but also gets us all closer to useful answers.
I was tidying up an overspill of books recently when I came across “Running the Room” by school behaviour expert Tom Bennett, which I read after a few years working with teachers in my day job, and as a school governor.
The quote comes from an article by Tom Junod in American magazine Esquire about Fred Rogers, avuncular host of US Mister Rogers' Neighbourhood, recently portrayed by Tom Hanks. Junod’s scepticism of Rogers’ saintly reputation was changed upon meeting him after which he reflected on Rogers’ life work with that line, which stuck with me.
Imagine knowing what your “same small good thing” is. And even better, imagine being able to do that consistently over a long time to improve the lives of those around you.
Because knowing what your strength is (or strengths, if you are blessed with more than one, as I firmly believe we all are) the first step to getting better at doing it; doing it well in different contexts; and in doing it well consistently.
Excellent at adaptation
A few years ago an enlightened boss sent me on a leadership development course. I expected to be put through the grist of having my various weaknesses and blind spots highlighted and then "fixed". Based on a pre-course 360/peer feedback exercise, what surprised me was that it focused entirely on honing what others saw as my best features and even on things I enjoy doing.
What a luxury that was. Wouldn't it be great if we all got to find our own "small good thing" and then turn it into something even better? (I'm still working on mine, by the way, including the bit where I can describe them confidently and own them consistently!)
Slime mould - a better analogy for reslience?
Resilient, adjective
Capable of returning to an original shape or position, as after having been compressed. synonym: flexible.
Able to recover readily, as from misfortune.
Leaping back; rebounding; recoiling.
[Insert your preferred definition of resilience here] + Perspective = New and exciting ways of achieving even better results in future.
Working in fundraising for over 20 years you’d think I would have developed a thick skin and the capacity to keep going despite the occasional (quite regular?) knock back, wouldn’t you? Well, to a degree, yes. However… not always.
For me, the most important thing is some thinking. The bit where I think about the shape I want to be (not always the original shape); where I want to leap back to (not always where I started from) and how I want things to be next time.
A bit of perspective is a helpful ingredient at this point. (Here’s a link to download my Perspective Tool for some thoughts on that).
And if I’m honest, I actually think thin skin is better; it is more sensitive to stimuli and therefore able to send more useful information up to the brain; it also repairs itself more quickly.
If part of it is being able to turn set-backs into positives (which it is, as the now well-established SkillsBuilder Framework for Essential Skills underlines) then fundraisers - and anyone determined to achieve more for themselves and those around them - need the bits of the definitions above that are flexible, able to recover readily, leaping forward and bounding onward - along with the sometimes too often missing piece (for me, anyway) of reflecting and learning.
Don’t ask ”how resilient are you?” but “how are you resilient?” - Which is why I prefer a picture of an endlessly resourceful slime mould over the more usual stock image of a brain being squashed and returning to its original shape or a tree growing out of a cliff-side.
You can use the Skillsbuilder Benchmark to assess your own essential skills including “Staying Positive” via https://benchmark.skillsbuilder.org/dashboard. A straightforward benchmarking exercise highlights areas of strength and gives recommendations for further development too!